hk wheel chair lifts

hk wheel chair lifts

�2 Exhibits: Exhibits 1 and 2 were admitted without objection. The
respondent objected to Exhibits 3 and 4 on relevancy grounds.
Exhibit 4 is a surveillance tape commissioned by the respondent.
Exhibit 3 is the investigator's notes of his surveillance. At the beginning
of the trial, the Court reserved ruling on the objections and asked Mr.
Angel to reoffer the exhibits if he deemed them helpful. He did so at
the end of trial but I did not rule on their admissibility at that time.
After further considering the matter, I am admitting and considering
the exhibits as relevant.